Donald Trump on Why Planes Couldn’t Possibly Have Brought Down the World Trade Center Towers
Folks, fair warning before you read any further: this is bound to trigger some people.
Some people who aren’t awake yet or who refuse to look at the raw facts are going to get very angry. I’ve seen it happen time and time again when this topic is brought up.
So please don’t shoot the messenger. We are just here to report what we see.
And please, read the entire article. This is one of the longest articles we’ve ever posted and it’s full of videos and evidence that you need to see.
Now, speaking of messengers, let’s see what Donald Trump himself had to say right after the towers were hit. How’s that for a trustworthy messenger?
As the most well known man in real estate and construction in New York City, everyone wanted to interview Trump and get his opinion on what had just happened.
And here is the most famous interview that was done. In a very short 3 minute interview, Donald Trump explains the structural components that went into the WTC and why he can’t believe that a plane – even a 767 – could penetrate the building or cause it to fall like it did.
Then he makes his most famous statement: “I believe there had to also be bombs that went off almost simultaneously.”
Donald Trump is know for his intuition and unique way of looking at things….and being proven right eventually. How many times have we seen that happen? Trump will say something, be ridiculed for it, only to have it proven 100% true at some point in the future.
Please SHARE this article!
Will that happen again with 9/11? Take a look at what Trump had to say right after the attacks in 2001:
If you can’t watch the video, here is the transcript:
Alan Marcus: Donald you’re probably the best-known builder particularly of great buildings in the city. There’s a great deal of question about whether or not the damage and and the ultimate destruction of the buildings was caused by the airplanes by architectural defect or possibly by bombs or more after shocks you have any thoughts on that?
Donald Trump: It wasn’t architectural defect. The World Trade Center was always known as a very very strong building. Don’t forget that took a big bomb in the basement (1993). Now, the basement is the most vulnerable place because that’s your foundation and it withstood that and I got to see that area about three or four days after took place because one of my structural engineers actually took me for a tour because he did the building and I said “I can’t believe it”. The the building was standing solid and half of the columns were blown out. This was an unbelievably powerful building. If you don’t know anything about structure it was one of the first buildings that was built from the outside. The steel, the reason the World Trade Center had such narrow windows is that in between all the windows, you had the steel on the outside, the steel on the outside of the building.
That’s why when I first looked – and you had these big heavy i-beams. When I first looked at it, I couldn’t believe it, because there was a hole in the steel and this is steel that was, you remember the width of the windows of the World Trade Center folks. I think you know if you were ever up there, they were quite narrow and in between was this heavy steel. I said how could a plane, even a plane, even a 767 or 747 or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through this steel? I happen to think that they had not only a plane but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously, because I just can’t imagine anything being able to go through that wall. Most buildings are built with the steel on the inside around the elevator shaft. This one was built from the outside which is the strongest structure you can have and it was almost just like a can of soup
Rolland Smith: You know, Donald we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming into building number two and when you see that approach the far side and and all of a sudden within a matter of milliseconds the explosion pops out the other side.
Donald Trump: Right. I just think that there was a plane with more than just fuel. I think obviously they were very big planes. They were going very rapidly, because I was also watching where the plane seemed to be not only going fast it seems to be coming down into the building. So is getting the speed from going down hill so to speak. It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction is even more than a big plane because you’re talking about talking about steel, the heaviest caliber steel that was used on the building. These buildings were rock-solid and you know it’s just an amazing amazing thing. This country is different today and it’s going to be different than it ever was for many years to come.
So, if there were bombs, who placed them? And were they on the planes or in the buildings?
It’s almost impossible to imagine that a big enough bomb was smuggled onto the planes. They almost certainly had to be in the buildings.
Now here’s the video that’s sure to trigger many people. But I dare you to watch it with an open mind. Challenge. Ask questions. Question the official story they’ve spoon fed us.
Take a look:
Last Week This Video Was Deleted For No Apparent Reason. Please Share This Video Before It Disappears …. Again
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, June 21, 2017
From our friends at LettersFromTheGulag.com:
Dr. Judy Wood from Clemson University – her area is Structural Engineering – she is so censored by the establishment they won’t allow her a Wikipedia page. They would give a pimple on Al Sharpton’s butt a wiki page. But not this acclaimed structural engineer with 30 years experience, who has been investigating 911 since 9/11/2001.
This is a compilation of quotes from the video below:
When you remove everything it cannot be, then you are left with what is, no matter how implausible, and as it happens the technology exists to “dustify” the Towers on 911, steel and concrete molecules separated into atoms in a split second, office furnishings, everything turn to dust in mid-air, except as the pictures show paper, for some reason paper escaped and was spread all around Manhattan. Things that glowed, that appeared hot, were sitting on paper that was not burning. It produced four to six inches of dust for miles around. And none of it was “hot.” Here is visual proof. One of the steel columns standing at an estimated height of 900 feet in the air, just turns to dust in mid-air as did the buildings a split second before. Actually, the twin towers fell faster than a controlled demolition. And technically they did not fall, they did not “collapse” they “dustified”, some particles heavier than air fell down, particles lighter than air floated away, ‘Gone With The Wind.’ When you have a new technology, you need a new word to make it visual in our minds, they dustified. This still shot is from the video below. This is an “energy weapon” based on Tesla technology. This was a psychological operation NOT an attack, per se.
And do you remember this? How come this building never fell if fire can melt steel?
Here’s even more:
Why do you think this video aired once and then was never allowed to be aired again?
This breaks it down perfectly:
You do know $2.3 TRILLION was missing from the Pentagon, right?
And you do know that the plane that (impossibly) hit the Pentagon hit perfectly in the office where those records were stored?
You know that right?
Take a look:
Details continue to emerge:
Ok….let’s hear from you.
If you’ve made it this far in the article, please comment below! What do you think?
Is the official story correct?
Did something much more devious happen?
Is 9/11 the origin of “Fake News”?
Please comment below and vote in our new poll: Do You Believe the Official 9/11 Story?