BREAKING: Shocking Court Documents Reveal TRUTH About Roy Moore Accuser's Corrupt Motives -

BREAKING: Shocking Court Documents Reveal TRUTH About Roy Moore Accuser’s Corrupt Motives

Court documents related to the Alabama woman Tina Johnson, who says that Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore groped her in his office, is sparking intrigue about Johnson’s motives in making her claim. 

Breitbart has uncovered that Moore represented Johnson’s mother in a nasty custody case for the older woman’s grand daughter and Johnson’s son, Daniel Sitz.

Moore’s client pointed out her daughter’s irresponsibility with Daniel and lack of proper parenting.

Read More: LOL! Dem Senator Who Accused Trump Of Abusing Women RESIGNS Over Sex Harassment Claims!

The grandmother was awarded custody of the boy, perhaps leaving Ms. Johnson with a long-standing grudge against Moore.


More from Breitbart:

Johnson claims that she was so surprised by Moore’s alleged actions that she didn’t mention anything to her mother — even though Johnson described her mother as sitting next to her in Moore’s office just before the alleged incident.

Johnson’s mother, Mary Katherine Cofield, had hired Moore, then a private attorney, to represent her in the custody case for Johnson’s son, Daniel Sitz. The custody documents, filed by Moore, refer to Johnson by her married name at the time, Tina Sitz. reported that it “located the court documents from 1991, detailing the custody transfer.”

The website did not report on the nastiness of the soap opera-like custody case or that Moore’s client filed numerous court documents with allegations against Johnson. In one affidavit, Cofield stated that Johnson “has a violent nature and has been treated by a psychiatrist when she was approximately 15 years of age.”

Another document, signed by Moore, stated that Cofield — and not Johnson — was the “most fit and proper person” to have custody of Daniel Sitz.

Johnson’s son had resided with his grandmother, Cofield, since he was nine months old. Cofield says that, during those years, she provided Daniel with food, clothing, and shelter “without any assistance” from Johnson. A judge officially granted Cofield full custody on September 23, 1991.

In the custody documents, Johnson is accused of taking her son against his will. A September 11, 1991, affidavit signed by Daniel says that two days earlier, Johnson took him from elementary school “against my will and made me go to her home.”

An affidavit signed by Johnson’s mother claimed that Johnson took Daniel from school “forcefully and without my permission.”

Immediately after the school incident, documented by Moore’s office, Cofield was granted temporary custody of Daniel until the September 23 hearing at which she received permanent custody.

Daniel stated that he wants to “live with my grandmother with whom I have lived as long as I can remember.”

People with common sense know that the liberal mindset of accusation = reality is held by coastal elites only – in other words, those who have never met a foul southern damsel bent on revenge!

What’s worse, liberals still treat accusations against Democrats as mere accusations.

Stay connected with Trump News Email … FREE!

true, 'before' => '
', 'after' => '
' ) ); } ?>


Join the conversation!

Please share your thoughts about this article below. We value your opinions, and would love to see you add to the discussion!

You Might Like
Choose A Format
Trivia quiz
Series of questions with right and wrong answers that intends to check knowledge
Formatted Text with Embeds and Visuals
The Classic Internet Listicles